Open Source Ecosystem
We build robust developer tools, frameworks, and packages. Our open-source repositories represent our core capabilities and technical rigor, shared freely with the global developer community.
Featured GitHub Repositories
Leverage our verified developer frameworks to accelerate your local AI pipelines.
google-tts-studio
Google Text-to-Speech Studio
A full-featured web application for generating, playing, and downloading audio using the Google Cloud Text-to-Speech (TTS) API.
figma-to-tailwind
Figma to Tailwind Converter
A Node.js application that converts Figma design URLs into Tailwind CSS styled Astro Static Site Generator (SSG), Nuxt SSG, or plain Vite project archives.
astro-print-friendly
Astro Print Friendly
A single-page, scrollable print site template built with Astro and Tailwind CSS. Design in the browser, print to paper or export to PDF with pixel exact pages in your configured paper size.
MIT vs Apache 2.0 vs GPLv3
All Jampuk Intelligence featured repositories use Apache 2.0. Here is what that means compared to MIT and GPLv3, in plain terms.
MIT
Short and highly permissive
Apache 2.0
Permissive with patent protection
GPLv3
Strong copyleft license
Do almost anything with minimal rules.
Do almost anything, plus explicit patent rights.
Reuse freely, but derivatives must stay open.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes, if source and license travel with it.
Yes.
Yes.
Generally no for distributed derivatives.
No explicit patent grant.
Yes, includes express patent grant.
Yes, includes patent grant and retaliation terms.
No.
No.
Yes for distributed modified versions.
Keep copyright and MIT notice.
Keep copyright, license, NOTICE, and state changes.
Keep copyright, license, source offer, and state changes.
Least strict.
Medium, paperwork is heavier than MIT.
Most strict.
Maximum reuse with minimal obligations.
Business-friendly reuse with patent clarity.
Guaranteeing downstream software stays open.
MIT
Short and highly permissive
- Best in one line
- Do almost anything with minimal rules.
- Commercial use
- Yes.
- Modify and distribute
- Yes.
- Use in closed proprietary software
- Yes.
- Patent protection
- No explicit patent grant.
- Must publish source changes
- No.
- Attribution and license notice
- Keep copyright and MIT notice.
- Strictness
- Least strict.
- Good for
- Maximum reuse with minimal obligations.
Apache 2.0
Permissive with patent protection
- Best in one line
- Do almost anything, plus explicit patent rights.
- Commercial use
- Yes.
- Modify and distribute
- Yes.
- Use in closed proprietary software
- Yes.
- Patent protection
- Yes, includes express patent grant.
- Must publish source changes
- No.
- Attribution and license notice
- Keep copyright, license, NOTICE, and state changes.
- Strictness
- Medium, paperwork is heavier than MIT.
- Good for
- Business-friendly reuse with patent clarity.
GPLv3
Strong copyleft license
- Best in one line
- Reuse freely, but derivatives must stay open.
- Commercial use
- Yes.
- Modify and distribute
- Yes, if source and license travel with it.
- Use in closed proprietary software
- Generally no for distributed derivatives.
- Patent protection
- Yes, includes patent grant and retaliation terms.
- Must publish source changes
- Yes for distributed modified versions.
- Attribution and license notice
- Keep copyright, license, source offer, and state changes.
- Strictness
- Most strict.
- Good for
- Guaranteeing downstream software stays open.
Our choice: Apache 2.0 gives users broad commercial and modification rights while preserving patent and attribution safeguards.
Simple summary only, not legal advice. Check the full license text before reuse.
Integrate & Scale Our Open-Source Technology
Need help customizing or deploying our open-source grounding libraries inside your enterprise cloud? Book a technical briefing with our chief architect.